#Epic vs apple trial trial

'This also blunts Cragg's distinction of mobile play as a 'fleeting experience.' If I were Apple, I would argue that this is because most players prefer to play on consoles, resorting to iPhone only when they are forced to leave home.' 'But Apple's statistics - only a little more than 10% of Fortnite players and 13% of the game's revenue came from players using iOS during the time in question - shows that even if gameplay is different, iPhone represents a small part of the market for Fortnite. 'Epic expert Michael Cragg testified to what's common knowledge among 14-year-old gamers - there is a great difference between playing Fortnite, or any other game, on iPhone and playing it on a console,' he explains.

Hoppe says that, while Epic is said to have made a decent effort in fighting to assert its view of iOS as 'a gaming universe unto itself,' Apple managed to 'parry every thrust Epic has made.' David B.

#Epic vs apple trial trial

This stage of the trial has been dubbed by many as the 'battle of the experts.' Gamma Law managing partner David B. Most of the sessions for week two of Epic vs Apple were dedicated to the economists each side called to press forward with their definitions of relevant markets and aspects of the smartphone business that may influence the judge's decision at the end of the trial. The antitrust trial that could reshape the mobile games industry rumbles on, having now entered what should be its final week.Īs the focus finally turns to Apple and its defence against Epic's accusations of monopolistic and anti-competitive behaviour - and following last week's article - we reached out to legal experts for their take on last week's proceedings.